3 ms·
I'm also defending science by, as you say, pointing out that it's like what most people do all the time. But it's precisely for this reason that I don't think t
by jasonhansel 3y ago
I'm also defending science by, as you say, pointing out that it's like what most people do all the time. But it's precisely for this reason that I don't think that one can draw any clear distinction between scientists and non-scientists or see scientists as somehow distinct from "citizens."
Of course, we can use various terms to describe people belonging to specific institutions or working in specific disciplines, but I don't think it makes any sense to draw a general distinction between "professional scientists," "amateur scientists," and "non-scientists." (Few, I think, consider "amateur" a compliment.)
- tsimionescu 3y ago"amateur" and "professional" have pretty precise definitions: a professional X is someone who is payed to do X, an amateur X is someone who does X without being payed for it. So, someone who does science without being paid specifically to do science is quite appropriately named "an amateur scientist".