3 ms·
> That is an assumption in itself. No one is obligated to act under that premise. No, it is not. By definition, "[t]he universe is often defined as "the totali
by nateb2022 3y ago
> That is an assumption in itself. No one is obligated to act under that premise.
No, it is not. By definition, "[t]he universe is often defined as "the totality of existence", or everything that exists, everything that has existed, and everything that will exist."[0]
If we hold that everything is without meaning, we cannot hold that anything has meaning. It would be a contradiction.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe
- vacuity 3y agoEven if the universe is all of existence, that the universe holds no meaning is an axiom. If that means that I can't hold anything to a meaning, I reject that axiom because I do hold things to have meaning. I'm not mindlessly typing out this reply; I have thoughts about philosophy that I think to present. I at least hold meaning for studying philosophy and participating in a discussion about philosophy.