3 ms·
That is interesting take. But I still don’t understand how come people feel like it is worth to spend time writing comment on something they don’t have time to
by ozim 3y ago
That is interesting take.
But I still don’t understand how come people feel like it is worth to spend time writing comment on something they don’t have time to read through.
- bjornasm 3y agoYou don't understand how people rather want to read some short comments and share their thoughts than to spend a lot more time reading a long blogpost?
- ozim 3y agoYes, blogpost we discuss here isn’t even that long. For any meaningful discussion there is context required. Writing out thoughts without context might be funny or might be silly but that is disrespectful to everyone.
- haswell 3y agoI also don’t fully accept the premise that not reading is why people are commenting critically. Personally, I read the whole thing, kinda scratched my head about the framing of it all, and came here to find what apparently seemed like agreement with my reaction. It became more clear what the author was going for when he clarified, and in that light, the post makes more sense. But I think someone lacking that context or familiarity with the author’s style and taking the content a bit too literally at first (like me) is another source of the critical commentary. Things got a bit off track when this became a thread about people refusing to read, or lacking comprehension. From my perspective there are two ways to read it, and I think this pretty much guarantees some confusion.