3 ms·
None. And that is in spite of massive attempts over the 20th century, including some of the first applications of computers to a problem of this nature. The con
by OfSanguineFire 3y ago
None. And that is in spite of massive attempts over the 20th century, including some of the first applications of computers to a problem of this nature. The conclusion drawn from this lack of progress is that the corpus is simply too small for decipherment and/or we lack any surviving relatives for the language that the script recorded.
- dmarchand90 3y agoWhat kind of corpus do we have? Is it largely fragmented segments with a few symbols?
- civilitty 3y ago> The extant corpus, comprising some 1,427 specimens totalling 7,362 to 7,396 signs, if scaled to standard type, would fit easily on two sheets of paper. [1] [1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_A#Corpus https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_A#Corpus