3 ms·
Hah, that was one of my ~simultaneous internal "parse trees"... followed by, "oh, that's a shame". It's far too easy to read "pee PDF", "pee" is an independent
by tiffanyg 3y ago
Hah, that was one of my ~simultaneous internal "parse trees"... followed by, "oh, that's a shame".
It's far too easy to read "pee PDF", "pee" is an independent 'morpheme', and "PDF" is an independent initialism, or whatever... So, there's some real "strength" to that parse, at least for me. It basically crowded out other possibilities, quickly.
But, other than the possibly slightly unwise naming*, I'm quite interested in this - always looking for tools to help with formats with the complexity of PDF**. Thanks for pointing it out!
* Perhaps it's intentional though? After all, there's also "Big Faceless Organization", in the PDF space forever ... maybe it's a "Close your eyes, show me your face..." ref?*** Hahaha...
** One of the most complex I've ever worked with, factoring in all the media it gets rendered to / systems rendered with, including "digital presses" etc.
*** NSFW: https://youtu.be/eafRE74JGZ8 https://youtu.be/eafRE74JGZ8