4 ms·
It's not an argument against government subsidies, it's just looking at the economic viability of nuclear power relative to other options.
by antonvs 3y ago
It's not an argument against government subsidies, it's just looking at the economic viability of nuclear power relative to other options.
- Keyframe 3y agoRight. Does it account for positive / negative economic impact of (lack of) pollution?
- antonvs 3y agoThe goal, alluded to in the quote I provided, is to compare it to cleaner alternatives. The article I linked ends as follows: > "For all these reasons, nuclear energy, even though nuclear power is emission-free, is not a relevant solution for profitable, climate-friendly and sustainable energy in the future." According to the researchers, nuclear energy as a solution for climate protection is "an old narrative that is still as inaccurate as in the 1970s."