You read into what I wrote what isn’t there. I just pointed out, in my original comment, that the person who wrote the article may not be a qualified source of

You read into what I wrote what isn’t there. I just pointed out, in my original comment, that the person who wrote the article may not be a qualified source of information. Everyone should be curious and also be discerning on who it is they get their information from. We have a lot of people in the U.S. who know nothing about microbiology, virology, medicine thinking they did the research because they read articles from quacks. They think that by reading enough words that this constitutes doing the research. My retort to you was, in essence, to say that most of us aren’t qualified to decide for ourselves simply because a bunch of charts were given in the article.