3 ms·
Even Supreme Court judges appear to be unable to distinguish between lobbying and bribery, so I'm not sure what your two simple Wikipedia links (without further
by tremon 3y ago
Even Supreme Court judges appear to be unable to distinguish between lobbying and bribery, so I'm not sure what your two simple Wikipedia links (without further explanation) are supposed to show?
- gruez 3y agoThe difference is pretty clear. Lobbying is trying to influence the representative, and bribery is giving money in exchange for some of action. You could argue that the latter is a subset of the former, but that doesn't mean the reverse holds. All the professional lawyers writing amicus curiae briefs are very obviously trying to influence the justices. Do you think that should be banned?