4 ms·
if it is "your" company but you cannot change it, I put that it is not your company. but that in fact you are just its employee and not the other way around.
by BSEdlMMldESB 3y ago
if it is "your" company but you cannot change it, I put that it is not your company. but that in fact you are just its employee and not the other way around.
- swader999 3y agoGood catch. I rephrased it more to what I intended. (Parent replied to my initial comment: "If you can't change your Company, change your Company.")
- mikestew 3y agoIf I am catching your meaning correctly, I would also lower-case the second use of “company” to drive home a different usage of the word. I nitpick only because it’s a clever turn of a word that deserves understanding.
- swader999 3y agoFixed!
- cratermoon 3y agoDid we just witness a nit-picky "code" review, right here in the comments? I think we did.
- depressedpanda 3y agoIt wasn't nit picky as I wouldn't have understood what the author meant before the reviewers came in and suggested improvements.
- cratermoon 3y agoExcept that phrase is a pretty well-known aphorism. It's sort of the equivalent of using map and filter or reduce on a collection - just because a programmer hasn't seen map, filter, and reduce doesn't mean it's wrong. Perhaps the programmer needs more experience.