3 ms·
What procedure mitigating the supposed risk of this change was skipped due to management pressure according to TFA? The way I read it, the original change of th
by yosefk 3y ago
What procedure mitigating the supposed risk of this change was skipped due to management pressure according to TFA? The way I read it, the original change of the constant "3" to "4" was tested, it was observed to have the desired effect, and none of the delays before the coding and the testing by the developer or after it did anything to reduce the risk further.
- jacknews 3y agoThat would be the (non-existent) tests that should perhaps be run because "This affects everything in the factory." Probably the code still works with this change, but does the factory?