8 ms·
No, weight the scientific data by its credibility and importance, as one does with all scientific data.
by uniqueuid 3y ago
No, weight the scientific data by its credibility and importance, as one does with all scientific data.
- lumb63 3y agoYou and the other commenter above are speaking as if the post is full of citations to obscure cranks who are fabricating data and on rogue missions. He’s citing the International Panel on Climate Change and other large government organizations specializing in climate change and weather patterns. As to what “agenda” the author has, I’m unsure. Does the above commenter think the author holds shares in Carrier, and will benefit from the sale of air conditioners?
- mistrial9 3y agosomeone earned a PhD in Science in the USA in this topic, but the casual reader is the judge of credibility ? edit I have never heard of this person before today
- defrost 3y agoRoger Pielke Jr. earned a Ph.D. in Political Science (and water polo) at the University of Colorado in 1994. That's not a STEM science degree. Many people have interacted with him at length over the past decades and he bends actual science results to cast as much shade as he can get away with over AGW while continuously claiming he accepts the science. If anything the desmog link above is too kind.