3 ms·
No he didn't doubled-downed at all. Pauling claimed to the end of his life that Vitamin C works. Mainstream never replicated his studies. He even said that he w
by majkinetor 3y ago
No he didn't doubled-downed at all. Pauling claimed to the end of his life that Vitamin C works. Mainstream never replicated his studies. He even said that he would die from cancer probably a lot earlier then in his old age if he didn't megadose with C.
Its a shame that this story goes like it does, both for Pauling and vitamin C. To just label Pauling as a quack is mind blowingly disrespectful - he would probably get a third Nobel prize for DNA discovery unless he was prevented by US gov to attend important events. As for Vitamin C, the sole fact that all creatures on this planet produce it apart from 3 mutants is highly intriguing if nothing else.
I am personally megadosing with Vitamin C in various formats for around 15 years. I think I have only positive benefits from the start, and given that it is as harmless as water anybody can try.
The book "Ascorbate: The Science of Vitamin C" has good historic info if anybody is interested. Also, "Dynamic Flow" model tries to explain its workings in the body.
- moritzwarhier 3y agoWithout any judgement of the science, "doubling down" is by itself not a negative thing, is it? Not as native speaker myself, just wondering why you took offense on this choice of words. "Quack" is of course a different thing and the message of OP is clear.
- joshspankit 3y agoThe connotation of “doubling down” has about a 60/40 split where 40% of the time people hear “had faith in their ideas”, and 60% of the time they hear “had lost touch with reality and chased a bad idea”. I believe it comes from the cultural impression of gamblers where some “know what they’re doing” and walk away winners but the majority will keep betting and betting while they keep losing and losing.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- majkinetor 3y agoBecause of the context of course. Any word on its own can mean anything.