3 ms·
All four of those bullet points are flawed, and I think that's the point. They are _perceived_ reasons to not blog, rather than actual, legitimate reasons. That
by cyclotron3k 3y ago
All four of those bullet points are flawed, and I think that's the point. They are _perceived_ reasons to not blog, rather than actual, legitimate reasons. That's my take anyway.
- Agentlien 3y agoThat would have made sense if the second half would actually refute them. Instead it seems to assume they are truths but argue that you shouldn't care that your thoughts are unoriginal and others laugh at your stupidity.
- ginsider_oaks 3y agoThe point is that the first list is a series of (flawed) reasons that the author, and probably many others, have been discouraged from blogging. And even if you know they're flawed, it can still get in your head and discourage you, so the author provides a different list of reasons to still blog in spite of that. It's not meant as proving/disproving any of the points, but simply as motivation to keep going.
- isykt 3y agoThat’s only your take away because you read the entire post where the author negates all of these points and reaffirms his belief that blogging is worthwhile.