3 ms·
It's insidious anti-action propaganda. The implication is that if someone actually wanted to save the birds, you should support them, but actually everyone is
by nerdponx 3y ago
It's insidious anti-action propaganda.
The implication is that if someone actually wanted to save the birds, you should support them, but actually everyone is just looking to curtail your freedoms and nobody is actually looking to save the birds. Therefore don't even bother trying to save the birds, if you care at all about your freedom. Otherwise you're a soft gullible mark, you wouldn't want to be a mark, would you?
That such propaganda tends to align with consumption and/or antisocial and/or selfish behavior is a big clue, but it's not the end goal.