According to the data mentioned in "Equation Text" part, their abstract is misleading at best or just wrong (it seems we can't rely on authors to summarize thei

According to the data mentioned in "Equation Text" part, their abstract is misleading at best or just wrong (it seems we can't rely on authors to summarize their own papers accurately) e.g., the plot shows there is either no difference or LaTeX users produced slightly more text in 30 minutes: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0115069.g006 https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/...