I think that is a touchy angle. The statement is probably better as "most people shouldn't need a car" The touchy part is be ause the logic often goes, because

I think that is a touchy angle. The statement is probably better as "most people shouldn't need a car" The touchy part is be ause the logic often goes, because 100% can't get off cars, the necessary infrastructure to allow the 20% who could, won't be built. It's like public transit, it sucks due to shoe string funding, ridership is low because it sucks, funding is then reduced because ridership is low.