3 ms·
This is this from 2001.
by binkHN 3y ago
This is this from 2001.
- foobarbecue 3y agoIt seems like HN has stopped adding the year to articles lately? Is this a change of policy?
- morelisp 3y ago[flagged]
- dang 3y agoNot at all! but the years get added manually, either by submitters or moderators. What submissions did you see that needed a year but didn't get one?
- foobarbecue 3y agoGotcha. I just went back and checked some and they all have years now. Hypothesis: this was a perception bias on my part. The decline of social media has increased my HN engagement so that I'm reading more posts earlier, before they've had the year added.
- dang 3y ago> Hypothesis: this was a perception bias on my part. I don't know if it was or not but you definitely get a chocolate star for considering the possibility. You wouldn't (well, I can't) believe how uncommon that is!
- dang 3y agoAdded. Thanks!
- jozvolskyef 3y agoAnd yet widely believed, even by recent MD graduates*. * n=1 MD graduate, 3rd Faculty of Medicine UK