I agree they would slap “not fit for commercial purposes” since they did not sign up for this. I also agree the EU businesses would start requiring it which me

I agree they would slap “not fit for commercial purposes” since they did not sign up for this. I also agree the EU businesses would start requiring it which means they would not be allowed to use software that smugly slapped it into their README. If developers actually want commercial users then they need to meet the standards. If they are hobbyists or do not care to support those use cases, then they do not need to do that. Any business still using the software that asserts it is not fit for commercial purposes is then clearly using inadequate dependencys. The developers said it was unfit or did not want to bother with it; so this is a perfectly true and proper characterization.