4 ms·
> Introducing intentional, ubiquitous vulnerabilities is also a terrible idea No e2ee app has compromised device part of their threat model. People get ratted
by _8j50 3y ago
> Introducing intentional, ubiquitous vulnerabilities is also a terrible idea
No e2ee app has compromised device part of their threat model. People get ratted all the time on their phones bu criminals. This is the same thing except the gov is nice enough to not look ar everything, just scan for content
> Writing a script that comments out the lines of code for such scanning, and that compiles the application from source is trivial.
People write E2EE layers on top of existing messaging apps. > One example is OTR plugin for Pidgin/Gaim, another is CryptoCat that at one point had a system that operated on top of Facebook web UI.
Doesn't matter. Those apps can be backdoored too. The whole OS can. And the gov doesn't mind playing whack-a-mole. You can disagree with their policy but I disagree with openly collaborating on lying to policy makers on technical facts.
- maqp 3y ago>No e2ee app has compromised device part of their threat model. Oh really, here's one I made earlier https://github.com/maqp/tfc https://github.com/maqp/tfc :-) >The whole OS can. So how are you backdooring a bash script that comments out lines of code from Linux source before compiling it? You lying to policy makers with "it can be done" mindset sound like a stupid con that burns a lot of money and time in the process.