5 ms·
Darn. It's a shame that the icons are the only part of Bootstrap not under the same license. I was hoping this font would change that, but it's going to remain
by dangrossman 15y ago
Darn. It's a shame that the icons are the only part of Bootstrap not under the same license. I was hoping this font would change that, but it's going to remain a no-go for commercial sites and apps where the company isn't going to create a "credits" page just to link back to CC-BY licensed stuff. They'll just license Glyphicons instead.
In fact, now I'm curious. You took the Glyphicons set and effectively copied it, yes? I don't see a link to Glyphicons on your site, which their license requires. Aren't you therefore infringing their copyright by creating a derivative work without license?
- fortawesome 15y agoI'm re-considering the license for the font itself. I agree, attribution on a commercial site would not be ideal. Attribution in code, however, seems reasonable. I used the classes from the Glyphicons set for backwards compatibility, but every icon was designed from scratch. If you look closely, you'll notice many of them are quite different.
- wiradikusuma 15y agoHow about putting it in humans.txt?
- mjking 15y agoGreat work! +1 for attribution in the code on commercial sites.
- justincormack 15y agoAttribution in code is unworkable if you minify code as it will no longer be there. Coders who are looking that hard will be able to work out where the awsomeness came from. Embrace a sane open source license please, something that would eg allow distribution with Debian.
- mdda 15y agoMinifiers almost always have an option to preserve specially marked comments for precisely this reason (to preserve the license information).
- cobychapple 15y agoI would have thought attribution using comments in the main HTML would be an easy solution if you're minifying your CSS.
- drostie 15y agoAre you actually planning to sue people for not providing attribution? If not, you might just want to save yourself the headache by using a more permissive license -- BSD and MIT are popular but if you really like Creative Commons, they have the Zero License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Up to you, though.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- fortawesome 15y agoI've updated the license. It's still CC-BY, but the only attribution required is in human-readable code. That means it could be commented in your html, css, or wherever. No need to have it visible in the webpage itself, unless you're feeling generous.
- cobychapple 15y agoBrilliant. Thanks for the clarification, and for the cool resource!