Sure, I agree. But couldn't find much too doubt though. Questioning 10, 100 vs 200 kb. seemed nitting to me, if I may say that. I've seen a lot of bias again

Sure, I agree. But couldn't find much too doubt though. Questioning 10, 100 vs 200 kb. seemed nitting to me, if I may say that. I've seen a lot of bias against cloudflare since fastly's blaming and a lot seems exaggerated to me. It's like they have to hold standards 20 x higher than the rest to make the same point. And tbh. They actually didn't earn the blame that happened then ( if I remember it correctly) I'm sure fastly would be quick to point out any errors ( relevant or not) in benchmarking. And considering they didn't for a month and considering history, that also bears meaning. Since they are the obvious losers here ( only faster in Liberia... ). Additionally, I'm pretty sure eastdakota's statement "game on" and their unfortunate PR disaster ( they have gone much more silent since then), would mean they are double checking any benchmarking for errors. At least, if I can guess cloudflare 's management correctly. Note: fan of the firm + management. Got shares. If I wouldn't think they are acting in good faith, I'd probably sell my shares.