3 ms·
FreeBSD is crusty, but is it really bad enough to compare to DOS 5.02? Besides, who needs 32 bits when 16 will do ... (Not serious.)
by mbbrutman 3y ago
FreeBSD is crusty, but is it really bad enough to compare to DOS 5.02?
Besides, who needs 32 bits when 16 will do ...
(Not serious.)
- Borg3 3y agoHaha :) I always extend my respect for such stuff.. It just shows how everything is bloated and ballooned today.. You barelly can browse modern web with 32bit today.. VSZ hits the sky (3GB).
- AdieuToLogic 3y ago> Besides, who needs 32 bits when 16 will do ... Hahaha, well played! :-) Seriously, though, it is impressive to have a DOS machine running a web server in today's environment. I assume dynamic content is produced via Sidekick[0]... (ducks) 0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borland_Sidekick https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borland_Sidekick
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoFreeBSD is fine; FreeBSD with 4000 days of uptime would concern me just like a Linux box with that much uptime.