I don't agree that the article is drawn out or massive at all. It has 5 short sections, each only a few sentences, and each section answers a question relevant

I don't agree that the article is drawn out or massive at all. It has 5 short sections, each only a few sentences, and each section answers a question relevant to the topic: what is the F-117, why was it made, how did it work, when did we stop using it, and why did we stop using it. The questions are up front, and the answers are fairly concise.