> I think because acknowledging the pointlessness of something does not immediately or unequivocally make something else reasonable or justifiable How can some

> I think because acknowledging the pointlessness of something does not immediately or unequivocally make something else reasonable or justifiable How can something be moral or not in the face of meaninglessness. Just to use a ridiculous example, if I poop in the woods, that poop has no meaning to me so you can light it on fire or eat for all I care. However, if I work hard and buy a car, that car has tons of meaning to me so I do care if you light it on fire, or eat it.