> I explicitly asked if you had—the opposite of assuming. It felt like a rhetorical question, because without waiting for my answer, you presumed to explain to

> I explicitly asked if you had—the opposite of assuming. It felt like a rhetorical question, because without waiting for my answer, you presumed to explain to me, "Building a company from scratch is way more work than climbing a corporate hierarchy", and then you doubled down, presuming to know "the observations of ~everyone". What exactly was the purpose of your question, and what is your response to the answer "Yes"?