3 ms·
They are MUCH more aggressive now. It used to be that if you saw one, you could be 99% sure it would stop and wait for the path to be fully clear. Now, they w
by imperialdrive 3y ago
They are MUCH more aggressive now. It used to be that if you saw one, you could be 99% sure it would stop and wait for the path to be fully clear. Now, they will buzz right by you within a foot or two. Very alarming how quickly they progressed to being careless.
- JoshTko 3y agoGoogle will optimize minimizing deaths/accidents vs maximizing trips/revenue. So it seems that buzzing closer to people is optimal for Google.
- what-no-tests 3y agoThat's the "AI Alignment" problem we've heard so much about recently.
- ajmurmann 3y agoThe AI alignment problem for a decade used to be that AGI doesn't end humanity as a side effect. Now that the mainstream has caught on, it's been diluted.
- what-no-tests 3y agoHa we don't even have "alignment" among humans. In the Kantian style of "humans are an end in themselves, not a means toward the ends of others" kind of way.
- ajmurmann 3y agoAgain, that's a much more subtle version of alignment than what the term originally was used for. It used to refer to things like the paper clip maximizer and the strawberry problem which are much worse and fundamental.
- __loam 3y agoDo you have anything beyond anecdotal evidence to support this?