3 ms·
“Immediate spending for dubious potential lower inflation in the future, probably, we hope, act” doesn’t have the same ring to it. Side note, congress should b
by jondwillis 3y ago
“Immediate spending for dubious potential lower inflation in the future, probably, we hope, act” doesn’t have the same ring to it.
Side note, congress should be banned from adding biased names or acryonyms to bills. Just explain it. If the acronym spells something cute, try again.
- davedunkin 3y agoNames of bills should be given by a GPT that reads the bill and the CBO analysis of the bill.