3 ms·
The first one seems to me like non-existing, the "exemption" is a derogation (in some very specific cases). The .pdf of the Law is here: https://www.consilium
by jaclaz 3y ago
The first one seems to me like non-existing, the "exemption" is a derogation (in some very specific cases).
The .pdf of the Law is here:
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023/07/10/council-adopts-new-regulation-on-batteries-and-waste-batteries/ https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2023...
https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-2-2023-INIT/en/pdf https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-2-2023-INIT...
In the preamble:
>(39)
To ensure the safety of end-users, this Regulation should provide for a limited derogation for portable batteries from the removability and replaceability
requirements set for portable batteries concerning appliances that incorporate portable batteries and that are specifically designed to be used, for the majority of the active service of the appliance, in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water immersion
and that are intended to be washable or rinseable. This derogation should only apply when it is not possible, by way of redesign of the appliance, to ensure the safety of the end-user and the safe continued use of the appliance after the end-user has correctly followed the instructions to remove and replace the battery. Where the derogation applies, the product should be designed in such a way as to make the battery removable and replaceable only by independent professionals, and not by end-users.
Then it is in Article 11, 2nd paragraph:
>2 By way of derogation from paragraph 1, the following products incorporating portable batteries may be designed in such a way as to make the battery removable and replaceable only by independent professionals:
(a) appliances specifically designed to operate primarily in an environment that is regularly subject to splashing water, water streams or water immersion, and that are intended to be washable or rinseable;
The "operate primarily" as I understand it, may apply only to the new "iPhone Baywatch Edition" ;).
I cannot find anything about the cited second "exemption" about number of cycles.
- wryanzimmerman 3y agoIf the result of this law is “iPhone Baywatch edition”that seems like a complete win. Worrying about your phone when you go to the beach and similar activities is super annoying.
- jaclaz 3y agoNot so easy, according to the new (future) EU Law, you will need to be a licensed lifeguard to be allowed to buy and operate those "special" phones ;).
- sva_ 3y agoSeems like these numbers come from the "EcoDesign" regulation. Strange to have two "competing" pieces of legislation https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/24/23771064/european-union-battery-regulation-ecodesign-user-replacable-batteries https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/24/23771064/european-union-b...
- jaclaz 3y agoI see, thanks. The other article you just provided clears the matter, the one referenced in the thread seemed to attribute the "exemption" to the "battery regulation" one. But the "battery regulation" is already approved, while the "Ecodesign" is still only a draft (from what I can understand). It will be interesting to see how the EU will solve the "overlapping", it seems to me improbable that they will make in September (after the hypothetical approval of the "ecodesign" draft) an amendment to something approved only a few months before.
- WastingMyTime89 3y ago> it seems to me improbable that they will make in September (after the hypothetical approval of the "ecodesign" draft) an amendment to something approved only a few months before. Par for the course with the EU especially when it comes to laws dealing with the environments. See for exemple the regulations linked to the green taxonomy where half of the material is still missing despite the law coming into force and where information about how the law should actually be applied are published months late. The EU is kind of a joke sometimes.