3 ms·
Tampering with the contents is quite unlikely. And anyone visiting a security site as a technically minded person probably has javascript disabled initially. R
by superkuh 3y ago
Tampering with the contents is quite unlikely. And anyone visiting a security site as a technically minded person probably has javascript disabled initially.
Requiring HTTPS only for this is like requiring people wear bulletproof vests to visit your backyard BBQ. There is no doubt they are "safer". But it's also pretty silly.
- tatersolid 3y ago> Tampering with the contents is quite unlikely No, it was shockingly common for ISPs and public WiFi to modify sites. And many did inject malicious scripts or redirect users to malicious sites in order to monetize.