3 ms·
EFB (Electronic Flight Bags) have introduced all kinds of usability issues with aircraft that pilots must account for, and not just for mechanical reasons. Obj
by blantonl 3y ago
EFB (Electronic Flight Bags) have introduced all kinds of usability issues with aircraft that pilots must account for, and not just for mechanical reasons. Objects getting jammed into flight controls isn't an ipad phenomenon - clipboards, water bottles, etc all have contributed to mishaps.
One major issue with EFBs is many pilots extensive reliance on them for navigation and traffic avoidance, and their failure in flight since they are commercial off the shelf products. A very common issue during the summer months is for an iPad to very easily overheat and just shut down. Another is battery life. iPads are consumer electronic devices and aren't held to even a semblance of tolerances that aircraft avionics are held to, but they are relied upon as critial tools in flight now.
I've directly seen instances of aircraft that have violated airspace, gotten lost, and other issues that contribute just one more hole to the "swiss cheese" model of a catastrophic loss.
- bredren 3y agoThe ill-fated submersible Titan has been routed for its use of consumer grade hardware in displays and controls. I doubt it’s the only vessel to rely on this class of electronics. I wonder what it means that despite the risks involved these products continue to make it into mission critical workflows at sea and air.
- legitster 3y agoOn the USS Indiana you can seem them proudly highlighting the US of an Xbox controller: https://youtu.be/0StWrXoN8nI?t=509 https://youtu.be/0StWrXoN8nI?t=509 (Also note the insane amount of screens in the control room). But highlighting the gamepad on the Titan seems like more of a "gotcha" that journalists have latched onto than a legitimate concern. It almost certainly didn't fail because of consumer grade hardware - it failed because of poor engineering of its hull.
- dragonwriter 3y agoUsing a witeless gamepad as the primary maneuvering controls of a manned undersea vessel without an onboard backup is one (of very many) indications of reckless corner cutting, but, yes, not particularly likely the critical failure point.
- chx 3y agoCome now, the Titan should never have been built, the primary cause of loss was the carbon fiber laminate which is simply the wrong material for a submersible. This is not hindsight, there's a five year old terse answer on Quora of all places stating this: https://www.quora.com/Is-it-feasible-to-build-submarine-hulls-out-of-carbon-fiber-It-is-stronger-than-steel-per-weight-and-it-doesn-t-rust-Might-it-also-be-harder-to-detect-with-sonar/answer/Pierre-Smith-17 https://www.quora.com/Is-it-feasible-to-build-submarine-hull... and again three years ago https://www.quora.com/Why-isnt-the-military-navy-using-carbon-fiber-in-the-ships-It-costs-less-and-it-s-stronger/answer/Mike-Miller-117 https://www.quora.com/Why-isnt-the-military-navy-using-carbo... > Carbon fiber’s compression strength is poor. Its shear strength is low. It doesn’t dent; it either splinters or returns to shape and hides severe damage in the laminate.
- Clamchop 3y agoThe Titan had multiple failsafes to drop ballast and return to the surface under its own buoyancy. One such failsafe was time-delayed by material corrosion in seawater so it would eventually ascend without intervention. The cabin electronics weren't essential to its safety. The hull might have been, though. Hard to say.
- kayfox 3y agoThere are stories of maintenance going behind the instrument panels in airliners and finding all sorts of lost paperwork.
- mfkp 3y agoMy ipad shut down today on the ground while taking off due to extreme heat. Luckily I'm not an idiot and have backups in the cockpit.