> yours is the only insult so far What insult? > The law is heavily based on precedent. Yes, and that precedent is on my side. You admit your ignorance, but

> yours is the only insult so far What insult? > The law is heavily based on precedent. Yes, and that precedent is on my side. You admit your ignorance, but when people who aren't ignorant contradict your assertions, you double down on your ignorance and consistently move the goal posts. At the end of the day, you are arguing in support of violations of the first amendment. If you find that declaration insulting, reevaluate why you insist your ignorance is the right approach.