It seems like an anti-pattern to me to remove something without announcing it’s replacement, but say “we’ll figure it out later.” It’s hard to understand thing

It seems like an anti-pattern to me to remove something without announcing it’s replacement, but say “we’ll figure it out later.” It’s hard to understand things and communicate. Having two different messages at two different times is extra confusing. I think it’s generally easier to have a single message than to have two. So this probably means incompetence. Even if they think the replacement is worse, this indirection will make whatever they come up with worse. I think it may be a situation where they have to make a change and get political capital tied up in any change, not a specific change. So the conflict is “will we change” rather than “we’ll replace gold with blue” (or whatever). One of the organizational dysfunctions.