3 ms·

I don't think this is true, if international co-operation can happen, not everyone will try to build these systems. My point is, everyone sits on the internet

I don't think this is true, if international co-operation can happen, not everyone will try to build these systems. My point is, everyone sits on the internet and screams but Russia, but China, but no one really knows what they think about the situation because no serious discussions have begun. I did see an interview with Geoffrey Hinton who says that he can see Chinese researchers are concerned, he reads it in mailing lists. In my opinion that is a good start because again, I don't think the CCP is stupid and they also have a lot of influence in the world. My point is, trying to do nothing and maintaining the status quo won't end well either. I think most people have just given up, climate change now this, it's too much for people.

JumpCrisscross 3y ago
> if international co-operation can happen That’s the point. For a system such as this, it cannot. That’s just reality. It gives advantage to have it, particularly when others don’t. Its development happens in silence, making enforcement uncertain. And you don’t want to get into a shooting match without it when your enemy does.
- ChatGTP 3y ago
  So just sit back and hope for the best?
  - JumpCrisscross 3y ago
    > So just sit back and hope for the best? There are options between giving up and daydreaming. Consider: a public registry of who is working on what with which data. (Good opportunity to address the copyright question.) Working group to advise, without pomp, if there is a threat and what it might look like. We don't have an intelligent discussion because everyone speaking has a conflict of interest or no idea what they're talking about. Maybe making public more data, hard data, will help.
    - ChatGTP 3y ago
      That sounds like something, good.