>> If you look at benchmarks on fmt's Github page, you will see it consistently outperforms most other solutions out there, while being completely type safe and

>> If you look at benchmarks on fmt's Github page, you will see it consistently outperforms most other solutions out there, while being completely type safe and extensible. It's IMHO the best of both worlds. > Since I've already done a lot of work, show me some realistic and useful benchmark to support your claims? Duh, I apologize for not even reading your statement completely. So I went on this page and it is exactly how I imagined. libc printf 0.91s, libfmt 0.74s. 20% speedup is not nothing, but won't help when there is an actual bottleneck. (In this case the general approach has to be changed). Also compiled size is measurably larger even only with a few print statements in the binary. Compile time is f***** 8 times slower! These are all numbers coming from their own page -- expect to have slightly different numbers for your own use cases.