4 ms·
Same here. I try to see the bright side, where I am basically forced to write "clean" code because anything else just doesn't fit my buffer. And I feel a kinsh
by Netcob 3y ago
Same here. I try to see the bright side, where I am basically forced to write "clean" code because anything else just doesn't fit my buffer.
And I feel a kinship with current LLMs with small context sizes.
- elcritch 3y agoIt's funny, my input buffer may be small and it's a large mental drain to read busy code (ADHD con), however once I grasp how a code base works it's just there (ADHD pro). It makes me wonder if it's related to the hunter-gatherer origin hypothesis. In that scenario covering large tracks of land was beneficial and that ability can be used to mentally map code. The flop side this also leads to distractibility and boredom paying attention to monotonous details.
- dkh 3y agoThis is true for me as well, but the amount of time/effort it takes to get to that point can vary wildly, sometimes being a bit prohibitive, other times never fully getting there for the duration of the job. If I wrote the code, or was present for most of its growth, or have spent whatever time it took in this instance, I am pretty damn efficient with it indefinitely, as long as I don't for whatever reason take a huge break from working with that codebase. (As a ZFS fan, the silly analogy for my brain that I half-jokingly give people here is that I have a high amount of L2ARC)
- dkh 3y agoI did have this weird lightbulb moment a few weeks ago where for a moment I felt like an LLM was the perfect parallel to describe how my brain worked