2 ms·

You're just making up a bunch of claims that can't be falsified.

• keepamovin 3y ago
  The idea of "physics" that we can't measure can seem far out, but it may not be a strange as you first think. Dark matter is a mystery that we can't directly detect, only through its effects. Neutrinos were for a long time thought to not interact at all and have zero mass. Eventually, we figured out how to detect those. But if you like my original theses, I bet you're gonna love these: - maybe consciousness, gravity and dark matter are related - maybe they're all aspects / faces of some underlying thing that we don't know how to measure or explain But, bringing it back to your level: you could be right, but maybe you're just don't know how to falsify them? I'm sure a clever enough experimentalist could come up with an experiment. The reality of remote viewing, retrocausal/precognitive effects in "image exposure" experiments, psi effects on RNGs, etc, means there's something we don't know how to measure (or to shield). At least publicly I guess? The reality is the CIA's stargate project continued after the 1995 public debunking report, it just went black~~because it actually worked. It may be that we just don't have the words to describe what it is. It may not be a field in the sense that we commonly know that, but what else could it be? What would you call it--if you could put aside your priors for a sec, and accept that it's true--what would you call some sort of big picture explanatory aspect of reality that's related to this?