3 ms·
Yeah, I always wondered why Apple didn't achieve this at the time and had to remove headphone port and home button to make it water resistant. But that nomencl
by myspy 3y ago
Yeah, I always wondered why Apple didn't achieve this at the time and had to remove headphone port and home button to make it water resistant.
But that nomenclature is void if you ask me. I got water on the upper front part of my iPhone XS which is IP whatever and Face ID died. Apple said they wouldn't give me a new one because water resistant doesn't mean they have to replace your phone when something happens.
- pzo 3y agoI feel you - I had actually the same issue with my iphone XS few months ago - I was hiking for few hours inside humid cave. Even though I had phone in waterproof bag my TrueDepth sensor stopped working.
- user2342 3y ago> I always wondered why Apple didn't achieve this at the time and had to remove headphone port and home button to make it water resistant. They didn't do this for water proof iPhones - that were lame excuses. They removed e.g. the headphone jack early to increase incentives to adopot (the then future) Airpods.
- qball 3y ago>had to remove headphone port and home button to make it water resistant. This was an outright lie; some Android manufacturers (I believe it was Samsung and Sony, but maybe others as well) had waterproof phones with headphone jacks and it didn't seem to negatively affect the phone in other ways.
- scarface_74 3y agoExcept for that whole “requiring a rubber flap to be over the port to get water resistance” in the case of Samsung.