If it is, then it's some strange reverse psychology going on. Because he's saying the Rolex was not a good heirloom. It's a lot more suspicious that you say th

If it is, then it's some strange reverse psychology going on. Because he's saying the Rolex was not a good heirloom. It's a lot more suspicious that you say the Casio G-Shock is the choice of US soldiers. I thought it was a good article, and the good point it made is that things without commercial value make better heirlooms.