3 ms·
IMHO We'll develop learning paths to speed up adoption of new tools, so new junior people will have the skills from school. Or, we won't need people doing thos
by rlupi 3y ago
IMHO We'll develop learning paths to speed up adoption of new tools, so new junior people will have the skills from school.
Or, we won't need people doing those jobs anymore and they will do something else. There are tons of jobs in history that have been superseded, I sure don't miss some of them https://blogs.ancestry.com/cm/10-of-the-most-disgusting-jobs-in-history/ https://blogs.ancestry.com/cm/10-of-the-most-disgusting-jobs...
- rlupi 3y agoI want to clarify. I think there is a very clear issue in the short term and transition time. It is yet to be seen if we can adapt as a society to the accelerating pace of progress in many fronts. Society, as opposed to technology, can be the limiting factor of progress and that is ok. When I read about the struggles of actors and directors, to cite one example, I am not indifferent. I just think that there is no problem of no more junior people to learn old skills, they will learn instead new skills.