3 ms·
Then you don't like art, you like the product of art, the form or topography of art, the presentation of it, but not art itself. You like to consume a product.
by piva00 3y ago
Then you don't like art, you like the product of art, the form or topography of art, the presentation of it, but not art itself. You like to consume a product.
Some people do actually like the art, the process, the artist, the questions that art open (even if mundane such as "how did they think of this?"). Remove that and it's just a shell, a hollow product without soul. It's ok if you like that but then you don't actually like art.
- satvikpendem 3y agoSounds good, I don't actually care about "art" then, based on your definition.
- piva00 3y agoIt's not my definition, it's by definition art is: > the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects Conscious use of skill, there's no conscience in AI hence no art.
- renata 3y agoIf we're getting into the definition of art I feel like it's a hard sell that an actual episode of TV, with plot and actors and everything, isn't art because no creative impulse went into it, yet a plain orange canvas is art that's worth $80 million [1] just because a human touched it. [1]: https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/arts/design/rothko-painting-sells-for-record-nearly-87-million-at-christies.html https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/arts/design/rothko-painti...
- xctr94 3y agoYou’re conflating economic value with artistic value. The worth of a painting is a highly speculative number based on a few rich people deciding they want to trade in art. Artistic value is independent from it. Art may resonate with you, yet be economically worth nothing.