4 ms·
While the name Aptos is explained in the article, I was more curious about the previous name Bierstadt (because the font is "inspired by Swiss typography", but
by rob74 3y ago
While the name Aptos is explained in the article, I was more curious about the previous name Bierstadt (because the font is "inspired by Swiss typography", but the Swiss are not especially famous for their beer), and I found it in https://medium.com/microsoft-design/beyond-calibri-finding-the-next-microsoft-365-default-font-5ef83f028be2 https://medium.com/microsoft-design/beyond-calibri-finding-t...:
> As for the name, Bierstadt is named for one of Colorado’s 14,000-foot peaks. When I think of Swiss type, I think of the Alps, and since I’m based in Boulder, my Alps are the Rockies
So it was more of a multi-step reasoning: Switzerland -> Alps -> Mountains -> Rockies -> peak in the Rockies with German-sounding name -> Bierstadt.
Digging deeper into the rabbit hole, according to Wikipedia Mount Bierstadt was named after Albert Bierstadt, an American landscape painter who made the first recorded summit of the mountain in 1863. Bierstadt was born in Solingen, which is pretty far away from Switzerland (and more known for its fine knives than for its typography or its beer)...
- atonse 3y agoThis is exactly the kind of Wikipedia excursion I would’ve gone through. thanks for saving me the time!
- derekp7 3y agoI've always wondered if Ariel was named such so that it sorts at the top of the list of fonts. Thereby making it the default. Then, that brings the question -- is it default because it is the first in a sorted list? Or did they name it purposely so that it would sort to the top?
- jxramos 3y agothat's an interesting question, like "AAAA Plumbing" back when the physical phone book was the route for discovery. Folks would deliberately vie for position in that thing.
- hiccuphippo 3y agoSame for Apple, so it would show up before Atari in the phone book.
- tenebrisalietum 3y agoAsus was either originally going to be or originally intended to be Pegasus, but it was changed to "Asus" to be alphabetically first. I'm sure that's also the story behind the name Abit.
- bombcar 3y agoInteresting, that would imply it should be pronounced uh-sis not Ay-sus.
- ghaff 3y agoProbably not. Here's something I read: Arial: originally called Sonoran Sans Serif, the designers changed the name to Arial because they wanted a name that would evoke a modern, industrial feel, and because it sounded similar to "aerial," as in "aerial view," which they felt captured the font's modern and futuristic qualities.
- _jyty 3y agoWhen they refer to Swisss typography, they're likely referring to the International Typographic Style, which is also known as the Swiss Style (it's on Wikipedia). It's a style of graphic design. It typically uses a Grotesque sans serif font, like Helvetica or Univers (as opposed to a humanist sans serif).
- otterley 3y agoClosing the loop a bit, Helvetica is the second word of the Latin name of Switzerland (Confoederatio Helvetica). It's why the ISO 3166 code for the country is .ch.
- andylynch 3y agoThat would be a great name for a font site, but it’s Helvetia, from the same root in the Helvetii peoples’ name.
- roelschroeven 3y agoNo, it's really "Confoederatio Helvetica", as you can see e.g. on this coin: https://worldcoinsinfo.com/world_coins/swiss-5-franken-1888-1916-coin.html https://worldcoinsinfo.com/world_coins/swiss-5-franken-1888-... "Helvetia" exists too, as the female national personification of Switzerland. Both are indeed derived from the Helvetii.
- twobitshifter 3y agoThat interview is a great example of fluff responses with Bierstadt being the fluffiest where the fluff starts to conflict with itself. First: In today’s world, I believe a grotesque typeface’s voice needs a bit of a *human touch* to be more approachable and less institutional. Bierstadt’s systematic design contains organic touches to help *humanize* digital environments and *soften the regimented order* of grid typography. Later: My approach was to design a sans serif that would contrast with Arial by being *far more mechanical and rationalized.*. The terminal endings are *precisely sheared at 90°* — a modern note *contrasting the softer, angled endings* in Arial — and a lack of somewhat fussy curves found in Arial’s “a,” “f,” “y,” and “r.” Maybe Arial was too human?
- Aloha 3y agoIts' a better looking arial, I've long avoided the new MS core fonts and tend to stick with arial on windows documents I create.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]