We should use different language to distinguish YouTube's system of controlling intellectual property versus copyright. These two systems have some common aspec

We should use different language to distinguish YouTube's system of controlling intellectual property versus copyright. These two systems have some common aspects but have significant differences. I suggest sticking to "copystrike" and "content ID" as that is already YouTube's terminology. I don't know what the equivalent of "fair use" would be, but that may be moot as I don't think such a concept exists over there.