3 ms·
It doesn't entirely refute it, but yes it did mention their local news continued to flog the story daily. It does not make it clear why they closed in the firs
by Alupis 3y ago
It doesn't entirely refute it, but yes it did mention their local news continued to flog the story daily.
It does not make it clear why they closed in the first place, however.
I was speaking in general terms. Companies quiver at social media outrage. It's always performative... and it passes. Don't pay attention to it...
- hartator 3y agoThey had to because of the other 31 health violations the health dept found?
- Alupis 3y agoNo, the article says 31 violations, and there was a follow-up inspection. That's fairly normal for the food industry - only the absolute most severe violations would shut down the operation. The article doesn't make it clear the inspections are related, particularly given the first inspection was on the same date some of the guests reported falling ill. Edit: Here's the related story about the violations[1]. The article mentions the business was open on the 14th, the day after the follow-up inspection. So it does not appear they were closed due to any health inspection related reason. You can read the list of 31 violations - they are all mostly benign, and pretty typical for many restuarants. [1] https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/dining/2023/07/05/nikko-japanese-steak-house-and-sushi-bar-health-violations-found/70378584007/ https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/dining/2023/07/...