4 ms·

There's a slightly less breathless and more coherent report here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/mar/06/lulzsec-sabu-working-for-us-fbi?newsfeed=true

• eli 15y ago
  Give credit where its due: Fox News broke this story. The Guardian report appears to be based solely on the earlier Fox story and public documents.
  • nmridul 15y ago
    It has nothing to do with giving credits. I (and I'm sure many others would also) like to read less tabloid-y and factual reporting anytime and so would prefer to read the story on Guardian than on Fox.
    • eli 15y ago
      But the quotes are literally lifted from the Fox piece. The Guardian does not add much new reporting, it just lays out the existing facts in a way you find more agreeable.
      • corford 15y ago
        Which is what I thought I made clear when I linked to it i.e. same report, less hyperbole. Perhaps you would have preferred it if I had used the word "version" rather than "report"?
    • nikcub 15y ago
      the Guardian is a re-blog of an original fox story. you are showing a bias