4 ms·

I mean Free as in speech, not merely Open Source. I can't have a fully Free software stack, the kind that Richard Stallman would approve [not that I'm a follow

• PaulHoule 3y ago
  Like it has to be GPL not MIT or Apache?
  • Vox_Leone 3y ago
    Well, of course you are right in your assertion(s), in a sense. I'm not an expert in Licensing, just a concerned user of tech, but yes, for this exercise I mean GPL, as laid out on the FSF site: https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/sharing-knowledge-about-the-gnu-family-of-licenses https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/sharing-knowledge-about-... Consider it a challenge: can you build/setup an AI stack [or environment, or pipeline] that Richard Stallman would use?
    • smoldesu 3y ago
      > can you build/setup an AI stack [or environment, or pipeline] that Richard Stallman would use? GPT4All and RedPajama would both be sufficiently open for him to use, though neither is covered under an FSF-approved license. llama-cpp itself should be perfectly acceptable to him, and there are lots of open API wrappers for these models.