3 ms·
Hey, qdrant ceo here. Paul, you and your team are building amazing open-source tech! And, of course, you can scale (almost) anything with just more hardware. As
by andre-z 3y ago
Hey, qdrant ceo here.
Paul, you and your team are building amazing open-source tech!
And, of course, you can scale (almost) anything with just more hardware.
As Nirant mentioned in his Twitter response.
https://twitter.com/NirantK/status/1679525251213066245 https://twitter.com/NirantK/status/1679525251213066245
So, it is not only a question of performance but also efficiency.
PS: What about offering Qdrant as an alternative to PG on the supabase platform? Just an idea. :)
- egorr 3y agoi am not Paul of course, but i just want to highlight that the idea behind blogpost was to show that if you set some settings for postgres correctly, you can achieve much better performance ie you can notice that most of results are on the same hardware as in nirantk, and we achieved 7 times better RPS with 0.98 precision on it and 19 times better RPS with 0.91 precision on the same amount of cpu and memory goal was to compare pgvector with pgvector rather than any other technology
- kiwicopple 3y ago> What about offering Qdrant as an alternative to PG on the supabase platform We are "all in" on Postgres, but we could definitely find ways to support qdrant (probably a Wrapper: https://supabase.com/blog/postgres-foreign-data-wrappers-rust https://supabase.com/blog/postgres-foreign-data-wrappers-rus...)