Ok there’s some confusion here. Some studies being wrong does not make all of them wrong. It certainly doesn’t give anecdotes any special credibility. Furthe

Ok there’s some confusion here. Some studies being wrong does not make all of them wrong. It certainly doesn’t give anecdotes any special credibility. Furthermore the well established body of knowledge about of human induced climate change is made up of countless studies, predictions, observations and general scientific and engineering knowledge going back almost 200 years. To reject or throw that into doubt because there are a handful of swindlers in science just as in any other human endeavour is like saying all modern medical equipment is probably a fraud because of Theranos.