4 ms·
Hmm, yeah I think I grok the argument. But if excess cash flow can go to employees, would you also expect employees to inject their savings when the company has
by wepple 3y ago
Hmm, yeah I think I grok the argument. But if excess cash flow can go to employees, would you also expect employees to inject their savings when the company has a shortfall?
I always considered employment a fairly simple exchange of my services for a fairly set rate, and investors/owners/funders to be the risk takers for ups & downs?
- ImPostingOnHN 3y agowhy on earth would they do that? It's not like the executives or shareholders would. I'm certainly not throwing any additional cash at a single company I'm invested in if it's on hard times.