3 ms·
I do not know of any war or conflict where one of the primary or secondary goals was to liberate anyone from concentration/death camps (possible exceptions for
by NoMoreNicksLeft 3y ago
I do not know of any war or conflict where one of the primary or secondary goals was to liberate anyone from concentration/death camps (possible exceptions for POW camps though).
There are no scenarios where anyone manages to talk China or North Korea out of these peacefully. And while there probably are many where we win in a shooting war against either or both of those, none of those scenarios conclude with the world economy intact. What consumer goods can you name that your country makes domestically? We don't even make clothing domestically anymore. I suppose most are self-sufficient food-wise, so there'd only be a slight uptick in famines...
Hell, there's an entire younger generation that can't even bring themselves to condemn Maoism. But you want to sacrifice tens or hundreds of thousands of lives driving tank columns into Beijing?
- mrguyorama 3y ago>Hell, there's an entire younger generation that can't even bring themselves to condemn Maoism That's an absurd take
- NoMoreNicksLeft 3y agoYou misspelled "ongoing observation".
- xp84 3y agoAgree completely, but wanted to point out, on the food part you mentioned, I think China is a big food (rice) importer, so “we” have that going for us. Not that the CCP would bat an eye if half its population starved to death, they’d gladly “sacrifice” that to avoid losing power.