3 ms·
Yes. This is the main thrust of my point. If you spend enough time in threads on this topic here, you'll see people popping up complaining that there's no IC p
by jghn 3y ago
Yes. This is the main thrust of my point.
If you spend enough time in threads on this topic here, you'll see people popping up complaining that there's no IC path forward without taking time away from coding and requiring building good soft skills.
What I was getting at is that with few exceptions, no such path exists.
You're 100% right that one doesn't need to go into leadership roles, and definitely not management roles, to get there. But one's hands on keyboard contributions will top out at some point and the only way to move the needle further is to do something else on top of that.
I personally separate the concepts of leadership and people management. So to me, most paths forward start to enter the sphere of "leadership" one way or another. But this is just nomenclature, YMMV.
- karmakaze 3y agoWe might be in agreement but certain phrases like "I just want to code" detract from it. Technical leadership doesn't need to manage people, but soft skills are still valuable. This can be done in an IC role. > What I was getting at is that with few exceptions, no such path exists. What I believe the post to be about is what such an exception could look like as a model for other orgs.